Ford Territory vs Nissan X-Trail

Territory

Territory

VS
X-Trail

X-Trail

Overall Comparison Score

Territory

68
๐Ÿ† Winner
4 Point Difference
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

X-Trail

64

Executive Summary

Both Territory and X-Trail are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory (+2)
Efficiency Territory (+8)
Safety Equal
Practicality X-Trail (+2)
Ownership X-Trail (+4)

Pros & Cons

๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

X-Trail

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

X-Trail

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Category Breakdown

Territory

Performance โ€“ 13/20
Efficiency โ€“ 8/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 13/20
Ownership โ€“ 16/20

X-Trail

Performance โ€“ 11/20
Efficiency โ€“ 0/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 15/20
Ownership โ€“ 20/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec Territory X-Trail
Ground Clearance 190 210
Wheelbase 2716 2705
Length 4630 4680
Width 1935 1840
Height 1706 1725
Kerb Weight 1635 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 2150 2230
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 448 565
Towing Capacity 1200 1800
Spec Territory X-Trail
Engine 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol 2.5L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4-cylinder DOHC
Displacement 1798 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 126
Torque 320 233
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 200
0-100 km/h 9.8 10.2

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, X-Trail may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Territory scores 8 while X-Trail scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Territory scores 18 and X-Trail scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Territory scores 16 versus X-Trail scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Territory 13 and X-Trail 15, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Territory scoring 13 compared to X-Trail scoring 11, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Territory and X-Trail in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Territory scores 13 vs 11.

Efficiency: Territory scores 8 vs 0.

Safety: Territory scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Territory scores 13 vs 15.

Ownership: Territory scores 16 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs