Honda HR-V vs Volkswagen T-Roc

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda HR-V in South Africa

Honda HR-V

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW (160 hp)
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 16.0 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Roc in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol Automatic
ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance T-Roc
Mileage HR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

HR-V

62
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

T-Roc

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both HR-V and T-Roc are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance T-Roc +1 pts
Efficiency HR-V +2 pts
Safety T-Roc +2 pts
Practicality HR-V +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

HR-V

Performance 9/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

T-Roc

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

HR-V

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

T-Roc

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

HR-V

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

T-Roc

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification HR-V T-Roc
Ground Clearance 196 168
Wheelbase 2610 2630
Length 4340 4234
Width 1790 1819
Height 1590 1573
Kerb Weight 1360 1400
Gross Vehicle Weight 1780 1880
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 392
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Front Track Width - 1569
Rear Track Width - 1546
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification HR-V T-Roc
Engine 1.5L i-VTEC Petrol 1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1498 1395
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 119 110
Torque 145 250
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 203
0-100 km/h 11.5 9.1
Power @ RPM - 5000-6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1500-3500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda HR-V wins with 62 pts vs 61 pts for T-Roc

In structured scoring, HR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, T-Roc may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, HR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

HR-V scores 10 while T-Roc scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, HR-V scores 18 and T-Roc scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

HR-V scores 12 versus T-Roc scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives HR-V 13 and T-Roc 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows HR-V scoring 9 compared to T-Roc scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest HR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. HR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives HR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between HR-V and T-Roc in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: HR-V scores 9 vs 10.

Efficiency: HR-V scores 10 vs 8.

Safety: HR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: HR-V scores 13 vs 11.

Ownership: HR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives HR-V the advantage in this comparison.