Ford Puma vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+7
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Puma and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +5 pts
Efficiency Puma +1 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Territory +1 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Puma Territory
Ground Clearance 170 190
Wheelbase 2594 2716
Length 4186 4630
Width 1805 1935
Height 1531 1706
Kerb Weight 1325 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1775 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 456 448
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Front Track Width 1541 -
Rear Track Width 1534 -
Turning Radius 5.4 -
Specification Puma Territory
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 999 1798
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 140
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 170 320
Torque @ RPM 2000-4500 rpm -
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo -
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.8
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Puma scores 9 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Puma scores 20 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Puma scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Puma 12 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Puma scoring 8 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Puma and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 8 vs 13.

Efficiency: Puma scores 9 vs 8.

Safety: Puma scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Puma scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Puma scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.