Ford Puma vs Volkswagen T-Roc

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom

⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)

🔧 250 Nm

⛽ 14.0 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance T-Roc

⛽ Mileage Puma

🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Puma

/ 100

pts

T-Roc

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Puma and T-Roc are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance T-Roc +2 pts

Efficiency Puma +1 pts

Safety Equal

Practicality Puma +1 pts

Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

T-Roc

Performance 10/20

Efficiency 8/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 11/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

T-Roc

Pros

More powerful engine output

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Large families needing more practicality and usability

T-Roc

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Ground Clearance	170	168
Wheelbase	2594	2630
Length	4186	4234
Width	1805	1819
Height	1531	1573
Kerb Weight	1325	1400
Gross Vehicle Weight	1775	1880
Seating Capacity	5	5
Boot Space	456	392
Towing Capacity	1200	1200
Front Track Width	1541	1569
Rear Track Width	1534	1546
Turning Radius	5.4	5.4

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Engine	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid	1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid	Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement	999	1395
Cylinders	3	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	92	110
Power @ RPM	6000 rpm	5000-6000 rpm
Torque	170	250
Torque @ RPM	2000-4500 rpm	1500-3500 rpm
Fuel System	Direct Injection	Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Single Turbo	Single Turbo
Top Speed	185	203
0-100 km/h	10.5	9.1
Compression Ratio	10.5:1	10.5:1
Engine Position	Front Transverse	Front Transverse

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Transmission	7-Speed Automatic DCT	7-Speed DSG Automatic
Drive Type	FWD	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Front Wheel Drive	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Not Available	Not Available
Paddle Shifters	Standard	Standard
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Claimed Mileage	16.4	14.0
City Mileage	12	11
Highway Mileage	18	15
Fuel Tank Capacity	42	50
Emission Standard	Euro 6	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Airbags	8	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Hill Start Assist	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	Standard
Central Locking	Standard	Standard
Side Impact Beams	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Cruise Control	Adaptive	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Standard	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Standard
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Standard	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Seat Material	Sport Partial Leather	Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Electric 6-Way	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Front	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Ambient Sport Lighting	Standard
Folding Rear Seats	60/40 Split	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	Standard	Standard
Rear Armrest	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Climate Control	Automatic AC	Automatic AC
Power Windows	All Doors	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Smart Entry	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Standard	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Standard
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	Standard	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	Standard	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Infotainment Screen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen	10-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	6	8
Navigation System	Standard	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	12-inch Full Digital	10.25-inch Digital Cockpit
USB Ports	3	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Standard	Standard

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
LED Headlamps	Full LED	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Standard	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	19-inch Sport Alloy	18-inch Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	Not Available
Body Cladding	Standard	Standard
Rear Spoiler	Sport Rear Spoiler	Rear Spoiler

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Tyre Size	225/40 R19	215/50 R18
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Solid Disc	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Tyre Repair Kit	Space Saver

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Torsion Beam	Multi-Link
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Monocoque
Power Steering	Electric	Electric
Steering Column	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Service Interval	15,000 km or 1 Year	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Approx R5,000	Approx R5,200
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	Optional	Optional

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
Warranty Years	3	3
Warranty Kilometers	100000	100000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	6 Years

Specification	Puma	T-Roc
CO2 Emissions	118	128
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Mild Hybrid	Not Applicable
Noise Level	67	67

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 61 pts for T-Roc

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, T-Roc may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Puma scores 9 while T-Roc scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Puma scores 20 and T-Roc scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Puma scores 12 versus T-Roc scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Puma 12 and T-Roc 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Puma scoring 8 compared to T-Roc scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Puma and T-Roc in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 8 vs 10.

Efficiency: Puma scores 9 vs 8.

Safety: Puma scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Puma scores 12 vs 11.

Ownership: Puma scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Puma vs Volkswagen T-Roc

Ford Puma

Volkswagen T-Roc

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Puma

T-Roc

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Puma

T-Roc

Pros & Cons

Puma

T-Roc

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

T-Roc

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis