Ford Puma vs Ford Ranger

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

Ford Ranger

2.0 Bi-Turbo Raptor 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic

Switch Variant

Change Car B

ZAR 1,040,000 ex-showroom

⚡ 157 kW (211 hp)

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 12.8 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Ranger

⛽ Mileage Puma

🔑 Ownership Ranger

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Ranger

/ 100

pts

Puma

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Ranger has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Ranger +9 pts

Efficiency Puma +3 pts

Safety Equal

Practicality Puma +1 pts

Ownership Ranger +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 11/20

Ownership 16/20

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Puma

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros

More powerful engine output
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Ranger

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Ground Clearance	170	283
Wheelbase	2594	3270
Length	4186	5381
Width	1805	2180
Height	1531	1922
Kerb Weight	1325	2345
Gross Vehicle Weight	1775	3130
Seating Capacity	5	5
Boot Space	456	0
Towing Capacity	1200	2500
Front Track Width	1541	-
Rear Track Width	1534	-
Turning Radius	5.4	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Engine	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement	999	1996
Cylinders	3	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	92	157
Power @ RPM	6000 rpm	-
Torque	170	500
Torque @ RPM	2000-4500 rpm	-
Fuel System	Direct Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Single Turbo	-
Top Speed	185	180
0-100 km/h	10.5	10.2
Compression Ratio	10.5:1	-
Engine Position	Front Transverse	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Transmission	7-Speed Automatic DCT	10-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shift
Drive Type	FWD	4x4
Drivetrain Layout	Front Wheel Drive	Full-Time 4WD
LSD Available	Not Available	Electronic Locking Rear Differential
Paddle Shifters	Standard	-
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Electronic Two-Speed Transfer Case
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Claimed Mileage	16.4	12.8
City Mileage	12	8
Highway Mileage	18	11
Fuel Tank Capacity	42	80
Emission Standard	Euro 6	Euro 5
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	-
Auto Start Stop	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Airbags	8	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Standard
Hill Start Assist	Standard	-
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	-
Central Locking	Standard	-
Side Impact Beams	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Cruise Control	Adaptive	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Standard	-
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Standard
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Standard	-
Traffic Sign Recognition	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Seat Material	Sport Partial Leather	Raptor Leather and Suede
Seat Adjustment	Electric 6-Way	Power Driver and Passenger
Heated Seats	Front	Standard
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Standard
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Ambient Sport Lighting	Multi-Colour Ambient Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	60/40 Split	-
Front Armrest	Standard	-
Rear Armrest	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Climate Control	Automatic AC	Dual Zone Automatic
Power Windows	All Doors	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Smart Entry	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Standard	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Power Assisted Tailgate
Automatic Headlamps	Standard	-
Rain Sensing Wipers	Standard	-
Auto Dimming Mirror	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Infotainment Screen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen with SYNC 4
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	6	10
Navigation System	Standard	Integrated GPS Navigation
Digital Instrument Cluster	12-inch Full Digital	-
USB Ports	3	-
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Standard	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
LED Headlamps	Full LED	Matrix LED with Adaptive Beam
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Standard	Heavy Duty Roof Rails
Alloy Wheel Design	19-inch Sport Alloy	17-inch Raptor Off-road Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	-
Body Cladding	Standard	-
Rear Spoiler	Sport Rear Spoiler	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Tyre Size	225/40 R19	285/70 R17 All-Terrain
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Solid Disc	Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Tyre Repair Kit	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	FOX Racing Shocks with Aluminium Control Arms
Rear Suspension	Torsion Beam	FOX Racing Shocks with Watt Link
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Reinforced Ladder Frame
Power Steering	Electric	-
Steering Column	Tilt and Telescopic	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Service Interval	15,000 km or 1 Year	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Approx R5,000	Premium
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	24 Months
Maintenance Plan	Optional	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Warranty Years	3	4
Warranty Kilometers	100000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	4 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
CO2 Emissions	118	220
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Mild Hybrid	None
Noise Level	67	-

Specification	Puma	Ranger
Approach Angle	-	32
Departure Angle	-	24
Wading Depth	-	850
Terrain Modes	-	Normal
Locking Differential	-	Electronic Rear Lock

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Ranger wins with 70 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Puma scores 9 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Puma scores 20 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Puma scores 12 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Puma 12 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Puma scoring 8 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Puma and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 8 vs 17.

Efficiency: Puma scores 9 vs 6.

Safety: Puma scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Puma scores 12 vs 11.

Ownership: Puma scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Puma vs Ford Ranger

Ford Puma

Ford Ranger

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Ranger

Puma

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Ranger

Puma

Pros & Cons

Puma

Ranger

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

Ranger

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis