Ford Puma vs Nissan Qashqai

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
VS
Nissan Qashqai in South Africa

Nissan Qashqai

1.3 Tekna CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 545,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)
🔧 270 Nm
⛽ 17 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Qashqai
Mileage Qashqai
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Qashqai

66
/ 100
+5
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Puma and Qashqai are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Qashqai +2 pts
Efficiency Qashqai +4 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Qashqai +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Qashqai

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 13/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Qashqai

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Qashqai

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Puma Qashqai
Ground Clearance 170 180
Wheelbase 2594 2665
Length 4186 4425
Width 1805 1835
Height 1531 1625
Kerb Weight 1325 1450
Gross Vehicle Weight 1775 1980
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 456 504
Towing Capacity 1200 1800
Front Track Width 1541 -
Rear Track Width 1534 -
Turning Radius 5.4 -
Specification Puma Qashqai
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid 1.3L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid Inline 4 Turbo
Displacement 999 1332
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 110
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm -
Torque 170 270
Torque @ RPM 2000-4500 rpm -
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo -
Top Speed 185 200
0-100 km/h 10.5 8.9
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Nissan Qashqai wins with 66 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Qashqai emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Qashqai performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Puma scores 9 while Qashqai scores 13 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Puma scores 20 and Qashqai scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Puma scores 12 versus Qashqai scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Puma 12 and Qashqai 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Puma scoring 8 compared to Qashqai scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Qashqai may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Qashqai performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Qashqai the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Puma and Qashqai in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 8 vs 10.

Efficiency: Puma scores 9 vs 13.

Safety: Puma scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Puma scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Puma scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Qashqai the advantage in this comparison.