Honda HR-V vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda HR-V in South Africa

Honda HR-V

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW (160 hp)
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 16.0 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance HR-V
Mileage HR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

HR-V

62
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both HR-V and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance HR-V +1 pts
Efficiency HR-V +1 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality HR-V +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

HR-V

Performance 9/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

HR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

HR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification HR-V Puma
Ground Clearance 196 170
Wheelbase 2610 2594
Length 4340 4186
Width 1790 1805
Height 1590 1531
Kerb Weight 1360 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1780 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 456
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification HR-V Puma
Engine 1.5L i-VTEC Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1498 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 119 92
Torque 145 170
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 11.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda HR-V wins with 62 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, HR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, HR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

HR-V scores 10 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, HR-V scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

HR-V scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives HR-V 13 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows HR-V scoring 9 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest HR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. HR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives HR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between HR-V and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: HR-V scores 9 vs 8.

Efficiency: HR-V scores 10 vs 9.

Safety: HR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: HR-V scores 13 vs 12.

Ownership: HR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives HR-V the advantage in this comparison.