Honda Elevate vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Elevate in South Africa

Honda Elevate

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 399,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW (160 hp)
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 16.0 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Elevate
Mileage Elevate
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Elevate

63
/ 100
+2
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Elevate and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Elevate +1 pts
Efficiency Elevate +1 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Elevate +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Elevate

Performance 9/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Elevate

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Elevate

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Elevate Puma
Ground Clearance 220 170
Wheelbase 2650 2594
Length 4312 4186
Width 1790 1805
Height 1650 1531
Kerb Weight 1240 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1680 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 458 456
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Elevate Puma
Engine 1.5L i-VTEC Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1498 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 119 92
Torque 145 170
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 12.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Elevate wins with 63 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Elevate emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Elevate performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Elevate scores 10 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Elevate scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Elevate scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Elevate 14 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Elevate scoring 9 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Elevate may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Elevate performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Elevate the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Elevate and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Elevate scores 9 vs 8.

Efficiency: Elevate scores 10 vs 9.

Safety: Elevate scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Elevate scores 14 vs 12.

Ownership: Elevate scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Elevate the advantage in this comparison.