Toyota C-HR vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 499,000 ex-showroom

⚡ 135 kW (181 hp)

🔧 185 Nm

⛽ 18.0 km/l

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance C-HR

⛽ Mileage C-HR

🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

C-HR

/ 100

pts

Puma

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both C-HR and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance C-HR +3 pts

Efficiency C-HR +3 pts

Safety Equal

Practicality Equal

Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Performance 11/20

Efficiency 12/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

C-HR

Pros

More powerful engine output
Better fuel efficiency

Cons

No major weaknesses identified

Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Puma

Pros

No major strengths identified

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Puma

Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Ground Clearance	165	170
Wheelbase	2640	2594
Length	4390	4186
Width	1820	1805
Height	1565	1531
Kerb Weight	1545	1325
Gross Vehicle Weight	1945	1775
Seating Capacity	5	5
Boot Space	437	456
Towing Capacity	1200	1200
Front Track Width	-	1541
Rear Track Width	-	1534
Turning Radius	-	5.4

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Engine	2.0L HEV Self-Charging Hybrid	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type	Inline 4-cylinder M20A-FXS Hybrid	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement	1987	999
Cylinders	4	3
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	135	92
Torque	185	170
Fuel System	Multi-Point Fuel Injection	Direct Injection
Top Speed	180	185
0-100 km/h	8.5	10.5
Power @ RPM	5200 rpm	6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM	4000 rpm	2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger	Not Available	Single Turbo
Compression Ratio	-	10.5:1
Engine Position	-	Front Transverse

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Transmission	e-CVT Automatic	7-Speed Automatic DCT
Drive Type	FWD	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Front Wheel Drive	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Not Available	Not Available
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters	-	Standard
Differential Lock	-	Not Applicable

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Claimed Mileage	18.0	16.4
City Mileage	16	12
Highway Mileage	20	18
Fuel Tank Capacity	43	42
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	-	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Airbags	8	8
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Not Available	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Hill Start Assist	-	Standard
Alarm System	-	Standard
Central Locking	-	Standard
Side Impact Beams	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Cruise Control	Standard	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	-	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	-	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Seat Material	Fabric	Sport Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Not Available	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Steering	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Ambient Sport Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	-	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	-	Standard
Rear Armrest	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Climate Control	Manual	Automatic AC
Power Windows	All Doors	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Remote Key	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	-	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	-	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Infotainment Screen	8-inch Touchscreen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Wireless
Android Auto	Standard	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	6	6
Navigation System	Not Available	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	-	12-inch Full Digital
USB Ports	-	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	-	Standard

Specification	C-HR	Puma
LED Headlamps	LED Projector	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	Front	LED
Roof Rails	Standard	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	20-inch Black Alloy Wheels	19-inch Sport Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	-	Not Available
Body Cladding	-	Standard
Rear Spoiler	-	Sport Rear Spoiler

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Approach Angle	18	-
Departure Angle	20	-
Wading Depth	350	-
Terrain Modes	Not Available	-
Locking Differential	Not Available	-

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Tyre Size	225/40 R20	225/40 R19
Wheel Type	Steel with Covers	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	-	Tyre Repair Kit

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Torsion Beam	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Monocoque
Power Steering	-	Electric
Steering Column	-	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Service Interval	10000 km / 12 months	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Approx R5,000
Battery Warranty	24 Months	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	-	Optional

Specification	C-HR	Puma
Warranty Years	3	3
Warranty Kilometers	100000	100000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	-	6 Years

Specification	C-HR	Puma
CO2 Emissions	98	118
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Self-Charging HEV	Mild Hybrid
Noise Level	-	67

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota C-HR wins with 67 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, C-HR emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, C-HR performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

C-HR scores 12 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, C-HR scores 20 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

C-HR scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives C-HR 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows C-HR scoring 11 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest C-HR may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. C-HR performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives C-HR the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between C-HR and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C-HR scores 11 vs 8.

Efficiency: C-HR scores 12 vs 9.

Safety: C-HR scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: C-HR scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: C-HR scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives C-HR the advantage in this comparison.

Toyota C-HR vs Ford Puma

Toyota C-HR

Ford Puma

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

C-HR

Puma

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

C-HR

Puma

Pros & Cons

C-HR

Puma

Who Should Buy Which?

C-HR

Puma

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis