Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+19
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Territory holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +3 pts
Efficiency Territory +1 pts
Safety Territory +6 pts
Practicality Territory +5 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification NP300 Hardbody Territory
Ground Clearance 215 190
Wheelbase 2500 2716
Length 4875 4630
Width 1760 1935
Height 1655 1706
Kerb Weight 1395 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 2400 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space Not Applicable 448
Towing Capacity 2500 1200
Front Track Width 1495 -
Rear Track Width 1490 -
Turning Radius 5.8 -
Load Bed Length 1907 -
Load Bed Width 1454 -
Specification NP300 Hardbody Territory
Engine 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 2488 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 98 140
Power @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Torque 304 320
Torque @ RPM 1750-2500 rpm -
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo -
Top Speed 168 185
0-100 km/h 12.5 9.8
Compression Ratio 17.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP300 Hardbody scores 7 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP300 Hardbody scores 12 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP300 Hardbody scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP300 Hardbody 8 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP300 Hardbody scoring 10 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 10 vs 13.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 8 vs 13.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.