Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Ranger

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger in South Africa

Ford Ranger

2.0 Bi-Turbo Raptor 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,040,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 157 kW (211 hp)
🔧 500 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Ranger
Mileage NP300 Hardbody
🔑 Ownership Ranger

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Ranger

70
/ 100
+21
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Ranger holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Ranger +7 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Safety Ranger +8 pts
Practicality Ranger +3 pts
Ownership Ranger +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Performance 17/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 16/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Ranger

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification NP300 Hardbody Ranger
Ground Clearance 215 283
Wheelbase 2500 3270
Length 4875 5381
Width 1760 2180
Height 1655 1922
Kerb Weight 1395 2345
Gross Vehicle Weight 2400 3130
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space Not Applicable 0
Towing Capacity 2500 2500
Front Track Width 1495 -
Rear Track Width 1490 -
Turning Radius 5.8 -
Load Bed Length 1907 -
Load Bed Width 1454 -
Specification NP300 Hardbody Ranger
Engine 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel 2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement 2488 1996
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 98 157
Power @ RPM 3600 rpm -
Torque 304 500
Torque @ RPM 1750-2500 rpm -
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo -
Top Speed 168 180
0-100 km/h 12.5 10.2
Compression Ratio 17.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Ranger wins with 70 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP300 Hardbody scores 7 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP300 Hardbody scores 12 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP300 Hardbody scores 12 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP300 Hardbody 8 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP300 Hardbody scoring 10 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 10 vs 17.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 7 vs 6.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 8 vs 11.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.