Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)

🔧 304 Nm

⛽ 11.4 km/l

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance NP300 Hardbody

⛽ Mileage Puma

🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Puma

/ 100

+12

pts

NP300 Hardbody

/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Puma has a slight advantage, but NP300 Hardbody remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance NP300 Hardbody +2 pts

Efficiency Puma +2 pts

Safety Puma +8 pts

Practicality Puma +4 pts

Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20

Efficiency 7/20

Safety 12/20

Practicality 8/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP300 Hardbody

Pros

More powerful engine output

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP300 Hardbody

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Puma

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Ground Clearance	215	170
Wheelbase	2500	2594
Length	4875	4186
Width	1760	1805
Height	1655	1531
Kerb Weight	1395	1325
Gross Vehicle Weight	2400	1775
Seating Capacity	5	5
Boot Space	Not Applicable	456
Towing Capacity	2500	1200
Front Track Width	1495	1541
Rear Track Width	1490	1534
Turning Radius	5.8	5.4
Load Bed Length	1907	-
Load Bed Width	1454	-

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Engine	2.5L Turbocharged Diesel	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type	Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement	2488	999
Cylinders	4	3
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	98	92
Power @ RPM	3600 rpm	6000 rpm
Torque	304	170
Torque @ RPM	1750-2500 rpm	2000-4500 rpm
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Single Turbo	Single Turbo
Top Speed	168	185
0-100 km/h	12.5	10.5
Compression Ratio	17.5:1	10.5:1
Engine Position	Front Longitudinal	Front Transverse

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Transmission	7-Speed Automatic	7-Speed Automatic DCT
Drive Type	4WD	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Part-Time 4WD	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Not Available	Not Available
Paddle Shifters	Not Available	Standard
Transfer Case	Standard	Not Applicable
Differential Lock	Rear Lock	Not Applicable

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Claimed Mileage	11.4	16.4
City Mileage	9	12
Highway Mileage	12	18
Fuel Tank Capacity	75	42
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Airbags	4	8
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Hill Start Assist	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Not Available	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	Standard
Central Locking	Standard	Standard
Side Impact Beams	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Cruise Control	Not Available	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Not Available	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Not Available	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Seat Material	Fabric	Sport Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Not Available	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Hydraulic Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt Adjustable	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Ambient Sport Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	60/40 Split	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	Standard	Standard
Rear Armrest	Standard	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Climate Control	Manual AC	Automatic AC
Power Windows	Front	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Not Available	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Not Available	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	Not Available	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	Not Available	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Infotainment Screen	7-inch Touchscreen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Wireless
Android Auto	Standard	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	4	6
Navigation System	Not Available	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	Not Available	12-inch Full Digital
USB Ports	1	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
LED Headlamps	Halogen	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	Not Available	LED
Fog Lamps	Standard	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	Steel Wheels	19-inch Sport Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	Not Available
Body Cladding	Not Available	Standard
Rear Spoiler	Not Available	Sport Rear Spoiler

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Tyre Size	235/75 R15	225/40 R19
Wheel Type	Steel	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Full Size Steel Under-bed	Tyre Repair Kit

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Leaf Spring	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque
Power Steering	Hydraulic	Electric
Steering Column	Tilt Adjustable	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Service Interval	10,000 km or 6 Months	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Approx R3,500	Approx R5,000
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	Not Available	Optional

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Warranty Years	3	3
Warranty Kilometers	100000	100000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	6 Years

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
CO2 Emissions	228	118
Start Stop System	Not Available	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Mild Hybrid
Noise Level	74	67

Specification	NP300 Hardbody	Puma
Approach Angle	29	-
Departure Angle	23	-
Wading Depth	600	-
Terrain Modes	Not Available	-
Locking Differential	Rear	-
Underbody Protection	Partial	-

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP300 Hardbody scores 7 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP300 Hardbody scores 12 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP300 Hardbody scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP300 Hardbody 8 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP300 Hardbody scoring 10 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 10 vs 8.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 8 vs 12.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Puma

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

Ford Puma

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Puma

NP300 Hardbody

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Puma

NP300 Hardbody

Pros & Cons

NP300 Hardbody

Puma

Who Should Buy Which?

NP300 Hardbody

Puma

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis