Volkswagen Amarok vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Amarok
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Amarok

57
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Amarok has a slight advantage, but NP300 Hardbody remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok +3 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Amarok +6 pts
Practicality NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

NP300 Hardbody

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 192 215
Wheelbase 3097 2500
Length 5254 4875
Width 1944 1760
Height 1834 1655
Kerb Weight 2095 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Amarok NP300 Hardbody
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 98
Torque 400 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 180 168
0-100 km/h 10.5 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Amarok wins with 57 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Amarok emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Amarok performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Amarok may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Amarok performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Amarok the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 10.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Amarok the advantage in this comparison.