Nissan NP200 vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+23
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Territory holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +7 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Territory +6 pts
Practicality Territory +6 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP200

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP200

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification NP200 Territory
Ground Clearance 185 190
Wheelbase 2400 2716
Length 4535 4630
Width 1615 1935
Height 1530 1706
Kerb Weight 915 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1570 2150
Seating Capacity 2 5
Boot Space Not Applicable 448
Towing Capacity 500 1200
Front Track Width 1390 -
Rear Track Width 1385 -
Turning Radius 5.5 -
Load Bed Length 1815 -
Load Bed Width 1530 -
Specification NP200 Territory
Engine 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1598 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 65 140
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm -
Torque 147 320
Torque @ RPM 2800 rpm -
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 155 185
0-100 km/h 14.5 9.8
Compression Ratio 9.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP200 scores 8 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP200 scores 12 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP200 scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP200 7 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP200 scoring 6 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP200 and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP200 scores 6 vs 13.

Efficiency: NP200 scores 8 vs 8.

Safety: NP200 scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: NP200 scores 7 vs 13.

Ownership: NP200 scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.