Nissan NP200 vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual

Change Car A

ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)

🔧 147 Nm

⛽ 12.5 km/l

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Puma

⛽ Mileage Puma

🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Puma

/ 100

+16

pts

NP200

/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Puma holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Puma +2 pts

Efficiency Puma +1 pts

Safety Puma +8 pts

Practicality Puma +5 pts

Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20

Efficiency 8/20

Safety 12/20

Practicality 7/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP200

Pros

No major strengths identified

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Lower fuel efficiency
Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: General Use

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros

More powerful engine output
Better fuel efficiency
Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use

Cons

No major weaknesses identified

Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP200

Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Puma

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	NP200	Puma
Ground Clearance	185	170
Wheelbase	2400	2594
Length	4535	4186
Width	1615	1805
Height	1530	1531
Kerb Weight	915	1325
Gross Vehicle Weight	1570	1775
Seating Capacity	2	5
Boot Space	Not Applicable	456
Towing Capacity	500	1200
Front Track Width	1390	1541
Rear Track Width	1385	1534
Turning Radius	5.5	5.4
Load Bed Length	1815	-
Load Bed Width	1530	-

Specification	NP200	Puma
Engine	1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type	Inline 4 Cylinder	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement	1598	999
Cylinders	4	3
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	65	92
Power @ RPM	5200 rpm	6000 rpm
Torque	147	170
Torque @ RPM	2800 rpm	2000-4500 rpm
Fuel System	Multi-Point Injection	Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Not Available	Single Turbo
Top Speed	155	185
0-100 km/h	14.5	10.5
Compression Ratio	9.5:1	10.5:1
Engine Position	Front Longitudinal	Front Transverse

Specification	NP200	Puma
Transmission	5-Speed Manual	7-Speed Automatic DCT
Drive Type	RWD	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Rear Wheel Drive	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Not Available	Not Available
Paddle Shifters	Not Available	Standard
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Specification	NP200	Puma
Claimed Mileage	12.5	16.4
City Mileage	10	12
Highway Mileage	14	18
Fuel Tank Capacity	47	42
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
Airbags	4	8
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Hill Start Assist	Not Available	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Not Available	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Not Available	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Optional	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	Standard
Central Locking	Standard	Standard
Side Impact Beams	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
Cruise Control	Not Available	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Not Available	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Not Available	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
Seat Material	Fabric	Sport Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Not Available	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Hydraulic Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Not Available	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Ambient Sport Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	Not Applicable	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	Not Available	Standard
Rear Armrest	Not Applicable	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
Climate Control	Manual AC	Automatic AC
Power Windows	Front	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Not Available	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Not Available	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	Not Available	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	Not Available	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
Infotainment Screen	7-inch Touchscreen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Optional	Wireless
Android Auto	Optional	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	4	6
Navigation System	Not Available	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	Not Available	12-inch Full Digital
USB Ports	1	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Not Available	Standard

Specification	NP200	Puma
LED Headlamps	Halogen	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	Not Available	LED
Fog Lamps	Not Available	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	Steel Wheels	19-inch Sport Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	Not Available
Body Cladding	Not Available	Standard
Rear Spoiler	Not Available	Sport Rear Spoiler

Specification	NP200	Puma
Tyre Size	175/70 R14	225/40 R19
Wheel Type	Steel	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Full Size Steel Under-bed	Tyre Repair Kit

Specification	NP200	Puma
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Leaf Spring	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque
Power Steering	Hydraulic	Electric
Steering Column	Not Adjustable	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	NP200	Puma
Service Interval	10,000 km or 6 Months	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Approx R2,500	Approx R5,000
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	Not Available	Optional

Specification	NP200	Puma
Warranty Years	3	3
Warranty Kilometers	100000	100000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	6 Years

Specification	NP200	Puma
CO2 Emissions	178	118
Start Stop System	Not Available	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Mild Hybrid
Noise Level	72	67

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP200 scores 8 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP200 scores 12 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP200 scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP200 7 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP200 scoring 6 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP200 and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP200 scores 6 vs 8.

Efficiency: NP200 scores 8 vs 9.

Safety: NP200 scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: NP200 scores 7 vs 12.

Ownership: NP200 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.

Nissan NP200 vs Ford Puma

Nissan NP200

Ford Puma

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Puma

NP200

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Puma

NP200

Pros & Cons

NP200

Puma

Who Should Buy Which?

NP200

Puma

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis