Nissan NP200 vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance NP300 Hardbody
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100
+4
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both NP200 and NP300 Hardbody are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance NP300 Hardbody +4 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

NP300 Hardbody

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification NP200 NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 185 215
Wheelbase 2400 2500
Length 4535 4875
Width 1615 1760
Height 1530 1655
Kerb Weight 915 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 1570 2400
Seating Capacity 2 5
Boot Space Not Applicable Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 500 2500
Front Track Width 1390 1495
Rear Track Width 1385 1490
Turning Radius 5.5 5.8
Load Bed Length 1815 1907
Load Bed Width 1530 1454
Specification NP200 NP300 Hardbody
Engine 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1598 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 65 98
Power @ RPM 5200 rpm 3600 rpm
Torque 147 304
Torque @ RPM 2800 rpm 1750-2500 rpm
Fuel System Multi-Point Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Single Turbo
Top Speed 155 168
0-100 km/h 14.5 12.5
Compression Ratio 9.5:1 17.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Nissan NP300 Hardbody wins with 49 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, NP300 Hardbody emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, NP300 Hardbody performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

NP200 scores 8 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, NP200 scores 12 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

NP200 scores 12 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives NP200 7 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows NP200 scoring 6 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest NP300 Hardbody may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. NP300 Hardbody performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives NP300 Hardbody the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between NP200 and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP200 scores 6 vs 10.

Efficiency: NP200 scores 8 vs 7.

Safety: NP200 scores 12 vs 12.

Practicality: NP200 scores 7 vs 8.

Ownership: NP200 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives NP300 Hardbody the advantage in this comparison.