Nissan Navara vs Ford Ranger

Navara

Navara

VS
Ranger

Ranger

Overall Comparison Score

Ranger

70
๐Ÿ† Winner
8 Point Difference
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Navara

62

Executive Summary

Ranger has a slight advantage, but Navara remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Ranger (+2)
Efficiency Ranger (+6)
Safety Ranger (+2)
Practicality Ranger (+2)
Ownership Navara (+4)

Pros & Cons

Navara

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Navara

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Ranger

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Category Breakdown

Ranger

Performance โ€“ 17/20
Efficiency โ€“ 6/20
Safety โ€“ 20/20
Practicality โ€“ 11/20
Ownership โ€“ 16/20

Navara

Performance โ€“ 15/20
Efficiency โ€“ 0/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 9/20
Ownership โ€“ 20/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec Navara Ranger
Ground Clearance 225 283
Wheelbase 3150 3270
Length 5330 5381
Width 1850 2180
Height 1810 1922
Kerb Weight 1985 2345
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 3130
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 0
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Spec Navara Ranger
Engine 2.5L Turbo Diesel 2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement 2488 1996
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 157
Torque 450 500
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 180
0-100 km/h 10.5 10.2

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Navara may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Navara scores 0 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Navara scores 18 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Navara scores 20 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Navara 9 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Navara scoring 15 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Navara and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Navara scores 15 vs 17.

Efficiency: Navara scores 0 vs 6.

Safety: Navara scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Navara scores 9 vs 11.

Ownership: Navara scores 20 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs