Nissan Navara vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan Navara in South Africa

Nissan Navara

2.5 Pro-4X Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 690,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Navara
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Navara

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Navara

71
/ 100
+22
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Navara holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Navara +5 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Navara +8 pts
Practicality Navara +1 pts
Ownership Navara +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Navara

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Navara

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Navara

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Navara NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 228 215
Wheelbase 3150 2500
Length 5260 4875
Width 1850 1760
Height 1855 1655
Kerb Weight 2050 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Navara NP300 Hardbody
Engine 2.5L Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 2488 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 98
Torque 450 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 168
0-100 km/h 10.5 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Nissan Navara wins with 71 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Navara emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Navara performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Navara scores 7 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Navara scores 20 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Navara scores 20 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Navara 9 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Navara scoring 15 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Navara may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Navara performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Navara the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Navara and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Navara scores 15 vs 10.

Efficiency: Navara scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: Navara scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Navara scores 9 vs 8.

Ownership: Navara scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Navara the advantage in this comparison.