Ford Mustang vs Toyota Yaris

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Toyota Yaris in South Africa

Toyota Yaris

1.5 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 359,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 88 kW (118 hp)
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 15.1 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage Yaris
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Yaris

57
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Mustang has a slight advantage, but Yaris remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +13 pts
Efficiency Yaris +3 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Yaris

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Yaris

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Yaris

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Mustang Yaris
Ground Clearance 134 160
Wheelbase 2720 2550
Length 4788 4180
Width 1916 1745
Height 1381 1500
Kerb Weight 1815 1110
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 1515
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 408 286
Towing Capacity Not Rated Not Rated
Front Track Width 1617 1490
Rear Track Width 1607 1490
Turning Radius 6.1 5.1
Specification Mustang Yaris
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 1.5L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 3 Cylinder NR
Displacement 4951 1496
Cylinders 8 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 88
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque 515 145
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm 4800 rpm
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Not Available
Top Speed 250 182
0-100 km/h 4.6 11.2
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 13.0:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Yaris

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Yaris may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Mustang performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while Yaris scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and Yaris scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus Yaris scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and Yaris 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to Yaris scoring 7, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Mustang may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Mustang performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Mustang the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and Yaris in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 7.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 8.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 10.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.