Ford Mustang vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

Mustang

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Mustang and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +7 pts
Efficiency Territory +3 pts
Safety Mustang +2 pts
Practicality Territory +3 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Mustang Territory
Ground Clearance 134 190
Wheelbase 2720 2716
Length 4788 4630
Width 1916 1935
Height 1381 1706
Kerb Weight 1815 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 2150
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 408 448
Towing Capacity Not Rated 1200
Front Track Width 1617 -
Rear Track Width 1607 -
Turning Radius 6.1 -
Specification Mustang Territory
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 4951 1798
Cylinders 8 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 140
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm -
Torque 515 320
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm -
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 250 185
0-100 km/h 4.6 9.8
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 67 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 13.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 8.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 13.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.