Ford Mustang vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)

🔧 515 Nm

⛽ 9.1 km/l

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)

🔧 170 Nm

⛽ 16.4 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Mustang

⛽ Mileage Puma

🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Mustang

/ 100

pts

Puma

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Mustang and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +12 pts

Efficiency Puma +4 pts

Safety Equal

Practicality Puma +2 pts

Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20

Efficiency 5/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 10/20

Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20

Efficiency 9/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Pros

More powerful engine output

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

Puma

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Puma

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Ground Clearance	134	170
Wheelbase	2720	2594
Length	4788	4186
Width	1916	1805
Height	1381	1531
Kerb Weight	1815	1325
Gross Vehicle Weight	2245	1775
Seating Capacity	4	5
Boot Space	408	456
Towing Capacity	Not Rated	1200
Front Track Width	1617	1541
Rear Track Width	1607	1534
Turning Radius	6.1	5.4

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Engine	5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol	1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type	V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated	Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement	4951	999
Cylinders	8	3
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	338	92
Power @ RPM	7300 rpm	6000 rpm
Torque	515	170
Torque @ RPM	4250 rpm	2000-4500 rpm
Fuel System	Direct Injection	Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Not Available	Single Turbo
Top Speed	250	185
0-100 km/h	4.6	10.5
Compression Ratio	12.0:1	10.5:1
Engine Position	Front Longitudinal	Front Transverse

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Transmission	10-Speed Automatic	7-Speed Automatic DCT
Drive Type	RWD	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Rear Wheel Drive	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Electronic LSD	Not Available
Paddle Shifters	Standard	Standard
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Claimed Mileage	9.1	16.4
City Mileage	7	12
Highway Mileage	11	18
Fuel Tank Capacity	61	42
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	Not Available	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Airbags	8	8
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard with Track Mode	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Hill Start Assist	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	Standard
Central Locking	Standard	Standard
Side Impact Beams	Standard	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Cruise Control	Standard	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Not Available	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	Not Available	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Seat Material	Leather	Sport Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Electric 6-Way	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Front	Front
Ventilated Seats	Front	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Ambient Sport Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	Not Available	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	Standard	Standard
Rear Armrest	Not Available	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Climate Control	Automatic AC	Automatic AC
Power Windows	All Doors	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Standard	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Convertible Soft Top	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	Standard	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	Standard	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	Standard	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Infotainment Screen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	8	6
Navigation System	Standard	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	12.4-inch Full Digital	12-inch Full Digital
USB Ports	2	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Standard	Standard

Specification	Mustang	Puma
LED Headlamps	Full LED	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	19-inch GT Alloy	19-inch Sport Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	Not Available
Body Cladding	Not Available	Standard
Rear Spoiler	Rear Spoiler	Sport Rear Spoiler

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Tyre Size	255/40 R19	225/40 R19
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Brembo Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Brembo Ventilated Disc	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Space Saver	Tyre Repair Kit

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Independent Multi-Link	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Monocoque
Power Steering	Electric	Electric
Steering Column	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Service Interval	10,000 km or 1 Year	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Approx R7,000	Approx R5,000
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	Optional	Optional

Specification	Mustang	Puma
Warranty Years	3	3
Warranty Kilometers	100000	100000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	6 Years

Specification	Mustang	Puma
CO2 Emissions	261	118
Start Stop System	Not Available	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Mild Hybrid
Noise Level	72	67

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Mustang performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Mustang may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Mustang performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Mustang the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 8.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 9.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 12.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Mustang vs Ford Puma

Ford Mustang

Ford Puma

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Mustang

Puma

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Mustang

Puma

Pros & Cons

Mustang

Puma

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

Puma

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis