Ford Mustang vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage NP300 Hardbody
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+18
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Mustang holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +10 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +2 pts
Safety Mustang +8 pts
Practicality Mustang +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Mustang NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 134 215
Wheelbase 2720 2500
Length 4788 4875
Width 1916 1760
Height 1381 1655
Kerb Weight 1815 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 2400
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 408 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not Rated 2500
Front Track Width 1617 1495
Rear Track Width 1607 1490
Turning Radius 6.1 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Mustang NP300 Hardbody
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 4951 2488
Cylinders 8 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 98
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm 3600 rpm
Torque 515 304
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm 1750-2500 rpm
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Single Turbo
Top Speed 250 168
0-100 km/h 4.6 12.5
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 17.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Mustang performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Mustang may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Mustang performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Mustang the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 10.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 7.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 8.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.