Ford Mustang vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+22
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Mustang holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +14 pts
Efficiency NP200 +3 pts
Safety Mustang +8 pts
Practicality Mustang +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Mustang NP200
Ground Clearance 134 185
Wheelbase 2720 2400
Length 4788 4535
Width 1916 1615
Height 1381 1530
Kerb Weight 1815 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 1570
Seating Capacity 4 2
Boot Space 408 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not Rated 500
Front Track Width 1617 1390
Rear Track Width 1607 1385
Turning Radius 6.1 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification Mustang NP200
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 4951 1598
Cylinders 8 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 65
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm 5200 rpm
Torque 515 147
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm 2800 rpm
Fuel System Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Not Available
Top Speed 250 155
0-100 km/h 4.6 14.5
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 9.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Mustang performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Mustang may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Mustang performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Mustang the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 6.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 8.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 7.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.