Ford Mustang vs Nissan Navara

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Nissan Navara in South Africa

Nissan Navara

2.5 Pro-4X Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 690,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage Navara
🔑 Ownership Navara

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Navara

71
/ 100
+4
pts
#2

Mustang

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Mustang and Navara are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +5 pts
Efficiency Navara +2 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Mustang +1 pts
Ownership Navara +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Navara

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Navara

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Navara

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Mustang Navara
Ground Clearance 134 228
Wheelbase 2720 3150
Length 4788 5260
Width 1916 1850
Height 1381 1855
Kerb Weight 1815 2050
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 3150
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 408 0
Towing Capacity Not Rated 3500
Front Track Width 1617 -
Rear Track Width 1607 -
Turning Radius 6.1 -
Specification Mustang Navara
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 2.5L Turbo Diesel
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 4951 2488
Cylinders 8 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 140
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm -
Torque 515 450
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm -
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 250 180
0-100 km/h 4.6 10.5
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Nissan Navara wins with 71 pts vs 67 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, Navara emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Navara performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Mustang scores 5 while Navara scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Mustang scores 20 and Navara scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Mustang scores 12 versus Navara scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Mustang 10 and Navara 9, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Mustang scoring 20 compared to Navara scoring 15, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Navara may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Navara performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Navara the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Mustang and Navara in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 15.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 7.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 9.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Navara the advantage in this comparison.