Isuzu MU-X vs Nissan Qashqai

MU-X

MU-X

VS
Qashqai

Qashqai

Overall Comparison Score

MU-X

73
๐Ÿ† Winner
11 Point Difference
Moderate difference between the two models.

Qashqai

62

Executive Summary

MU-X has a slight advantage, but Qashqai remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance MU-X (+2)
Efficiency Qashqai (+1)
Safety MU-X (+2)
Practicality Equal
Ownership MU-X (+8)

Pros & Cons

๐Ÿ† Overall Winner

MU-X

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Qashqai

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy What?

MU-X

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Qashqai

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Category Breakdown

MU-X

Performance โ€“ 12/20
Efficiency โ€“ 8/20
Safety โ€“ 20/20
Practicality โ€“ 13/20
Ownership โ€“ 20/20

Qashqai

Performance โ€“ 10/20
Efficiency โ€“ 9/20
Safety โ€“ 18/20
Practicality โ€“ 13/20
Ownership โ€“ 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec MU-X Qashqai
Ground Clearance 230 180
Wheelbase 2855 2665
Length 4850 4425
Width 1870 1835
Height 1825 1625
Kerb Weight 1950 1420
Gross Vehicle Weight 2800 1950
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 311 504
Towing Capacity 3000 1500
Spec MU-X Qashqai
Engine 1.9L Ddi Turbo Diesel 1.3L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Turbo
Displacement 1898 1332
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 110 110
Torque 350 250
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 198
0-100 km/h 11.8 9.2

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, MU-X emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Qashqai may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

MU-X vs EcoSport MU-X vs Everest MU-X vs Ranger MU-X vs Territory MU-X vs D-Max MU-X vs Magnite Qashqai vs EcoSport Qashqai vs Everest

People Also Compare

MU-X vs EcoSport MU-X vs Everest MU-X vs Territory MU-X vs Magnite MU-X vs X-Trail MU-X vs Corolla Cross

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, MU-X performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

MU-X scores 8 while Qashqai scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, MU-X scores 20 and Qashqai scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

MU-X scores 20 versus Qashqai scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives MU-X 13 and Qashqai 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows MU-X scoring 12 compared to Qashqai scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest MU-X may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. MU-X performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives MU-X the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between MU-X and Qashqai in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: MU-X scores 12 vs 10.

Efficiency: MU-X scores 8 vs 9.

Safety: MU-X scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: MU-X scores 13 vs 13.

Ownership: MU-X scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives MU-X the advantage in this comparison.

SUVs