Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW (271 hp)
🔧 381 Nm
⛽ 10.0 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 79
Mileage NP300 Hardbody
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 79

67
/ 100
+18
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Land Cruiser 79 holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 79 +8 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 79 +8 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Land Cruiser 79 NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 245 215
Wheelbase 3165 2500
Length 5255 4875
Width 1855 1760
Height 1870 1655
Kerb Weight 2280 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3500 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 120 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3000 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Land Cruiser 79 NP300 Hardbody
Engine 4.0L V6 Naturally Aspirated Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type V6 1GR-FE Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 3956 2488
Cylinders 6 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 202 98
Torque 381 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 165 168
0-100 km/h 11.0 12.5
Power @ RPM 5600 rpm 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM 4400 rpm 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger Not Available Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 79 wins with 67 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 79 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 79 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 11 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Land Cruiser 79 scoring 18 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 79 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 79 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 79 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Land Cruiser 79 and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 79 scores 18 vs 10.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 vs 7.

Safety: Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 79 scores 11 vs 8.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 the advantage in this comparison.