Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW (271 hp)
🔧 381 Nm
⛽ 10.0 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 79
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 79

67
/ 100
+22
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Land Cruiser 79 holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 79 +12 pts
Efficiency NP200 +2 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 79 +8 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Land Cruiser 79 NP200
Ground Clearance 245 185
Wheelbase 3165 2400
Length 5255 4535
Width 1855 1615
Height 1870 1530
Kerb Weight 2280 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 3500 1570
Seating Capacity 5 2
Boot Space 120 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3000 500
Front Track Width - 1390
Rear Track Width - 1385
Turning Radius - 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification Land Cruiser 79 NP200
Engine 4.0L V6 Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type V6 1GR-FE Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 3956 1598
Cylinders 6 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 202 65
Torque 381 147
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Top Speed 165 155
0-100 km/h 11.0 14.5
Power @ RPM 5600 rpm 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM 4400 rpm 2800 rpm
Turbocharger Not Available Not Available
Compression Ratio - 9.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 79 wins with 67 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 79 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 79 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 11 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Land Cruiser 79 scoring 18 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 79 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 79 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 79 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Land Cruiser 79 and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 79 scores 18 vs 6.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 vs 8.

Safety: Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 79 scores 11 vs 7.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 the advantage in this comparison.