Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Ford Mustang

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW (271 hp)
🔧 381 Nm
⛽ 10.0 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Mustang
Mileage Land Cruiser 79
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 79

67
/ 100
+0
pts
#2

Mustang

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Land Cruiser 79 and Mustang are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Mustang +2 pts
Efficiency Land Cruiser 79 +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Mustang

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Land Cruiser 79 Mustang
Ground Clearance 245 134
Wheelbase 3165 2720
Length 5255 4788
Width 1855 1916
Height 1870 1381
Kerb Weight 2280 1815
Gross Vehicle Weight 3500 2245
Seating Capacity 5 4
Boot Space 120 408
Towing Capacity 3000 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1617
Rear Track Width - 1607
Turning Radius - 6.1
Specification Land Cruiser 79 Mustang
Engine 4.0L V6 Naturally Aspirated Petrol 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol
Engine Type V6 1GR-FE V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 3956 4951
Cylinders 6 8
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 202 338
Torque 381 515
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 165 250
0-100 km/h 11.0 4.6
Power @ RPM 5600 rpm 7300 rpm
Torque @ RPM 4400 rpm 4250 rpm
Turbocharger Not Available Not Available
Compression Ratio - 12.0:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 79 wins with 67 pts vs 67 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 79 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 79 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 while Mustang scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 and Mustang scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 versus Mustang scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 11 and Mustang 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Land Cruiser 79 scoring 18 compared to Mustang scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 79 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 79 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 79 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Land Cruiser 79 and Mustang in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 79 scores 18 vs 20.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 vs 5.

Safety: Land Cruiser 79 scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 79 scores 11 vs 10.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 the advantage in this comparison.