Volkswagen Amarok vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW (271 hp)
🔧 381 Nm
⛽ 10.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 79
Mileage Amarok
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 79

67
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Amarok

57
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Land Cruiser 79 has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 79 +5 pts
Efficiency Amarok +1 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 79 +2 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 11/20
Ownership 12/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 79

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Land Cruiser 79

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok Land Cruiser 79
Ground Clearance 192 245
Wheelbase 3097 3165
Length 5254 5255
Width 1944 1855
Height 1834 1870
Kerb Weight 2095 2280
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 3500
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 120
Towing Capacity 3500 3000
Specification Amarok Land Cruiser 79
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 4.0L V6 Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled V6 1GR-FE
Displacement 1968 3956
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 202
Torque 400 381
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Not Available
Top Speed 180 165
0-100 km/h 10.5 11.0
Power @ RPM - 5600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4400 rpm

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 79 wins with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Amarok

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 79 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 79 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Land Cruiser 79 scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Land Cruiser 79 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Land Cruiser 79 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Land Cruiser 79 scoring 18, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 79 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 79 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 79 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 18.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 6.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 11.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 79 the advantage in this comparison.