Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW (304 hp)
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 9.4 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 300
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 300

70
/ 100
+9
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Land Cruiser 300 has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 300 +12 pts
Efficiency Puma +4 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Land Cruiser 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Land Cruiser 300 Puma
Ground Clearance 235 170
Wheelbase 2850 2594
Length 4985 4186
Width 1980 1805
Height 1910 1531
Kerb Weight 2430 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 3300 1775
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 309 456
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Front Track Width 1675 1541
Rear Track Width 1675 1534
Turning Radius 6.0 5.4
Specification Land Cruiser 300 Puma
Engine 3.3L Twin-Turbo V6 Diesel 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type V6 Twin-Turbocharged DOHC Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 3346 999
Cylinders 6 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 227 92
Power @ RPM 3000-3600 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque 700 170
Torque @ RPM 1600-2600 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 210 185
0-100 km/h 7.5 10.5
Compression Ratio 15.4:1 10.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 300 wins with 70 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 300 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Land Cruiser 300 scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 13 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Land Cruiser 300 scoring 20 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 300 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 300 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 300 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Land Cruiser 300 and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 vs 8.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 vs 9.

Safety: Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 300 scores 13 vs 12.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 300 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 the advantage in this comparison.