Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Ford Mustang

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW (304 hp)
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 9.4 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW (453 hp)
🔧 515 Nm
⛽ 9.1 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Tie
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 300

70
/ 100
+3
pts
#2

Mustang

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Land Cruiser 300 and Mustang are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Equal
Safety Equal
Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Family Usage

Mustang

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Land Cruiser 300

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Mustang

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Land Cruiser 300 Mustang
Ground Clearance 235 134
Wheelbase 2850 2720
Length 4985 4788
Width 1980 1916
Height 1910 1381
Kerb Weight 2430 1815
Gross Vehicle Weight 3300 2245
Seating Capacity 7 4
Boot Space 309 408
Towing Capacity 3500 Not Rated
Front Track Width 1675 1617
Rear Track Width 1675 1607
Turning Radius 6.0 6.1
Specification Land Cruiser 300 Mustang
Engine 3.3L Twin-Turbo V6 Diesel 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol
Engine Type V6 Twin-Turbocharged DOHC V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 3346 4951
Cylinders 6 8
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 227 338
Power @ RPM 3000-3600 rpm 7300 rpm
Torque 700 515
Torque @ RPM 1600-2600 rpm 4250 rpm
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Not Available
Top Speed 210 250
0-100 km/h 7.5 4.6
Compression Ratio 15.4:1 12.0:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 300 wins with 70 pts vs 67 pts for Mustang

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mustang may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 300 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 while Mustang scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 and Mustang scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Land Cruiser 300 scores 12 versus Mustang scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 13 and Mustang 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Land Cruiser 300 scoring 20 compared to Mustang scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 300 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 300 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 300 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Land Cruiser 300 and Mustang in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 vs 20.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 vs 5.

Safety: Land Cruiser 300 scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 300 scores 13 vs 10.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 300 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 the advantage in this comparison.