Honda HR-V vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda HR-V in South Africa

Honda HR-V

ZAR 489,900 – 529,900
⚡ 119 hp
🔧 145 Nm
⛽ 16.2 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

ZAR 520,000 – 610,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage HR-V
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Territory

68
out of 100
12
point lead
Moderate difference between the two models.

HR-V

56
out of 100

Executive Summary

Territory has a slight advantage, but HR-V remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +4 pts
Efficiency HR-V +2 pts
Safety Territory +6 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

HR-V

Performance 9/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

HR-V

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

HR-V

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification HR-V Territory
Ground Clearance 196 190
Wheelbase 2610 2716
Length 4340 4630
Width 1790 1935
Height 1590 1706
Kerb Weight 1320 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1750 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 437 448
Towing Capacity 1200 1200
Specification HR-V Territory
Engine 1.5L i-VTEC Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1498 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 119 140
Torque 145 320
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 11.8 9.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins this comparison with 68 points vs 56 points for HR-V.

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, HR-V may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

HR-V scores 10 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, HR-V scores 12 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

HR-V scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives HR-V 13 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows HR-V scoring 9 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between HR-V and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: HR-V scores 9 vs 13.

Efficiency: HR-V scores 10 vs 8.

Safety: HR-V scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: HR-V scores 13 vs 13.

Ownership: HR-V scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.