Honda HR-V vs Isuzu MU-X

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda HR-V

Change Car A

ZAR 489,900 – 529,900

⚡ 119 hp

🔧 145 Nm

⛽ 16.2 km/l

Isuzu MU-X

Change Car B

ZAR 670,000 – 820,000

⚡ 110 hp

🔧 350 Nm

⛽ 14.0 km/l

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance MU-X

⛽ Mileage HR-V

🔑 Ownership MU-X

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

MU-X

out of 100

point lead

Moderate difference between the two models.

HR-V

out of 100

Executive Summary

MU-X holds a noticeable edge over HR-V, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance MU-X +3 pts

Efficiency HR-V +2 pts

Safety MU-X +8 pts

Practicality Equal

Ownership MU-X +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Performance 12/20

Efficiency 8/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 13/20

Ownership 20/20

HR-V

Performance 9/20

Efficiency 10/20

Safety 12/20

Practicality 13/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

HR-V

Pros

Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency

🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

HR-V

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

MU-X

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Ground Clearance	196	230
Wheelbase	2610	2855
Length	4340	4850
Width	1790	1870
Height	1590	1825
Kerb Weight	1320	1950
Gross Vehicle Weight	1750	2800
Seating Capacity	5	7
Boot Space	437	311
Towing Capacity	1200	3000

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Engine	1.5L i-VTEC Petrol	1.9L Ddi Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated	Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement	1498	1898
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	119	110
Torque	145	350
Fuel System	Multi-Point Fuel Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed	185	175
0-100 km/h	11.8	11.8

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Transmission	CVT Automatic	6-Speed Automatic
Drive Type	4x2	4x2
Drivetrain Layout	Front Wheel Drive	Rear Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Not Available	Electronic Traction Control
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Single Speed

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Claimed Mileage	16.2	14.0
City Mileage	13	10
Highway Mileage	17	15
Fuel Tank Capacity	40	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Airbags	4	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Not Available	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Seat Material	Fabric	Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Power Driver
Heated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Steering	Rack and Pinion Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Standard

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Climate Control	Manual	Dual-zone Automatic
Power Windows	All Doors	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Remote Key	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Power Operated

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Infotainment Screen	8-inch Touchscreen	9-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Standard
Android Auto	Standard	Standard
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	6	8
Navigation System	Not Available	Built-in GPS

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
LED Headlamps	LED Reflector	LED Projector
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	Front	LED
Roof Rails	Standard	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	17-inch Steel with Covers	18-inch Alloy

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Approach Angle	18	23
Departure Angle	20	25
Wading Depth	350	800
Terrain Modes	Not Available	Normal Mode
Locking Differential	Not Available	Electronic Control

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Tyre Size	215/60 R17	265/60 R18
Wheel Type	Steel with Covers	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Disc

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	Double Wishbone
Rear Suspension	Torsion Beam	5-Link Coil Spring
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Ladder Frame

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Service Interval	10000 km / 12 months	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Moderate
Battery Warranty	24 Months	24 Months

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
Warranty Years	3	5
Warranty Kilometers	100000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	5 Years

Specification	HR-V	MU-X
CO2 Emissions	140	210
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	None

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu MU-X wins this comparison with 73 points vs 56 points for HR-V.

In structured scoring, MU-X emerges as the stronger overall package. However, HR-V may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, MU-X performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

HR-V scores 10 while MU-X scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, HR-V scores 12 and MU-X scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

HR-V scores 12 versus MU-X scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives HR-V 13 and MU-X 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows HR-V scoring 9 compared to MU-X scoring 12, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest MU-X may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. MU-X performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives MU-X the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between HR-V and MU-X in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: HR-V scores 9 vs 12.

Efficiency: HR-V scores 10 vs 8.

Safety: HR-V scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: HR-V scores 13 vs 13.

Ownership: HR-V scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives MU-X the advantage in this comparison.

Honda HR-V vs Isuzu MU-X

Honda HR-V

Isuzu MU-X

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

MU-X

HR-V

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

MU-X

HR-V

Pros & Cons

HR-V

MU-X

Who Should Buy Which?

HR-V

MU-X

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis