Toyota Hiace Ses'fikile vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota Hiace Ses'fikile in South Africa

Toyota Hiace Ses'fikile

2.5D 16-seat MT Diesel Manual
ZAR 549,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW (101 hp)
🔧 200 Nm
⛽ 11.0 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Puma
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+23
pts
#2

Hiace Ses'fikile

38
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Puma holds a noticeable edge over Hiace Ses'fikile, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Puma +1 pts
Efficiency Puma +2 pts
Safety Puma +14 pts
Practicality Puma +6 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Hiace Ses'fikile

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 6/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Hiace Ses'fikile

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Hiace Ses'fikile

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Puma

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Hiace Ses'fikile Puma
Ground Clearance 155 170
Wheelbase 3110 2594
Length 5380 4186
Width 1880 1805
Height 1990 1531
Kerb Weight 2055 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 3500 1775
Seating Capacity 16 5
Boot Space 0 456
Towing Capacity 2800 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Hiace Ses'fikile Puma
Engine 2.5L Turbodiesel 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4-cylinder 2KD-FTV Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 2494 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 75 92
Torque 200 170
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 145 185
0-100 km/h 18.0 10.5
Power @ RPM 3600 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM 1800 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger Turbocharged Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 38 pts for Hiace Ses'fikile

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Hiace Ses'fikile may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Hiace Ses'fikile scores 7 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Hiace Ses'fikile scores 6 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Hiace Ses'fikile scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Hiace Ses'fikile 6 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Hiace Ses'fikile scoring 7 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Hiace Ses'fikile and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Hiace Ses'fikile scores 7 vs 8.

Efficiency: Hiace Ses'fikile scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: Hiace Ses'fikile scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Hiace Ses'fikile scores 6 vs 12.

Ownership: Hiace Ses'fikile scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.