Toyota GR86 vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota GR86 in South Africa

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 173 kW (232 hp)
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 10.9 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance GR86
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

GR86

60
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Territory has a slight advantage, but GR86 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance GR86 +1 pts
Efficiency Territory +2 pts
Safety GR86 +2 pts
Practicality Territory +5 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

GR86

Performance 14/20
Efficiency 6/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

GR86

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

GR86

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification GR86 Territory
Ground Clearance 130 190
Wheelbase 2575 2716
Length 4265 4630
Width 1775 1935
Height 1310 1706
Kerb Weight 1270 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1660 2150
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 237 448
Towing Capacity Not Rated 1200
Front Track Width 1520 -
Rear Track Width 1540 -
Turning Radius 5.4 -
Specification GR86 Territory
Engine 2.4L Naturally Aspirated Boxer 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Horizontally Opposed 4-Cylinder (Boxer) Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 2387 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 173 140
Power @ RPM 7000 rpm -
Torque 250 320
Torque @ RPM 3700 rpm -
Fuel System Direct + Port Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available -
Top Speed 226 185
0-100 km/h 6.9 9.8
Compression Ratio 12.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 60 pts for GR86

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, GR86 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

GR86 scores 6 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, GR86 scores 20 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

GR86 scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives GR86 8 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows GR86 scoring 14 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between GR86 and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: GR86 scores 14 vs 13.

Efficiency: GR86 scores 6 vs 8.

Safety: GR86 scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: GR86 scores 8 vs 13.

Ownership: GR86 scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.