Toyota GR86 vs Ford Ranger

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic Petrol Automatic

Change Car A

ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 173 kW (232 hp)

🔧 250 Nm

⛽ 10.9 km/l

Ford Ranger

2.0 Bi-Turbo Raptor 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic

Switch Variant

Change Car B

ZAR 1,040,000 ex-showroom

⚡ 157 kW (211 hp)

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 12.8 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Ranger

⛽ Mileage Tie

🔑 Ownership Ranger

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Ranger

/ 100

+10

pts

GR86

/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Ranger has a slight advantage, but GR86 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Ranger +3 pts

Efficiency Equal

Safety Equal

Practicality Ranger +3 pts

Ownership Ranger +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 11/20

Ownership 16/20

GR86

Performance 14/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 8/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

GR86

Pros

No major strengths identified

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: General Use

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros

More powerful engine output
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

No major weaknesses identified

Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

GR86

Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Ranger

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Ground Clearance	130	283
Wheelbase	2575	3270
Length	4265	5381
Width	1775	2180
Height	1310	1922
Kerb Weight	1270	2345
Gross Vehicle Weight	1660	3130
Seating Capacity	4	5
Boot Space	237	0
Towing Capacity	Not Rated	2500
Front Track Width	1520	-
Rear Track Width	1540	-
Turning Radius	5.4	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Engine	2.4L Naturally Aspirated Boxer	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Horizontally Opposed 4-Cylinder (Boxer)	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement	2387	1996
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	173	157
Power @ RPM	7000 rpm	-
Torque	250	500
Torque @ RPM	3700 rpm	-
Fuel System	Direct + Port Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Not Available	-
Top Speed	226	180
0-100 km/h	6.9	10.2
Compression Ratio	12.5:1	-
Engine Position	Front Longitudinal	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Transmission	6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters	10-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shift
Drive Type	RWD	4x4
Drivetrain Layout	Rear Wheel Drive	Full-Time 4WD
LSD Available	Torsen LSD	Electronic Locking Rear Differential
Paddle Shifters	Standard	-
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Electronic Two-Speed Transfer Case
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Claimed Mileage	10.9	12.8
City Mileage	8	8
Highway Mileage	12	11
Fuel Tank Capacity	50	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	-
Auto Start Stop	Not Available	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Airbags	7	7
ABS	Standard with Sport Mode	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard with Track Mode	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Standard
Hill Start Assist	Standard	-
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	-
Central Locking	Standard	-
Side Impact Beams	Standard	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Not Available	-
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Not Available	-
Traffic Sign Recognition	Not Available	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Seat Material	Sport Fabric/Suede	Raptor Leather and Suede
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Power Driver and Passenger
Heated Seats	Not Available	Standard
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Standard
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Multi-Colour Ambient Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	50/50 Split	-
Front Armrest	Standard	-
Rear Armrest	Not Available	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Climate Control	Manual AC	Dual Zone Automatic
Power Windows	All Doors	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Standard	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Power Assisted Tailgate
Automatic Headlamps	Standard	-
Rain Sensing Wipers	Standard	-
Auto Dimming Mirror	Standard	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Infotainment Screen	8-inch Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen with SYNC 4
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Wireless
Android Auto	Standard	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	6	10
Navigation System	Standard	Integrated GPS Navigation
Digital Instrument Cluster	7-inch Digital	-
USB Ports	2	-
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Not Available	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
LED Headlamps	Full LED	Matrix LED with Adaptive Beam
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Heavy Duty Roof Rails
Alloy Wheel Design	18-inch BBS Alloy	17-inch Raptor Off-road Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	-
Body Cladding	Not Available	-
Rear Spoiler	Rear Spoiler	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Tyre Size	215/40 R18	285/70 R17 All-Terrain
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc Brembo	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Solid Disc	Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Space Saver	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	FOX Racing Shocks with Aluminium Control Arms
Rear Suspension	Double Wishbone	FOX Racing Shocks with Watt Link
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Reinforced Ladder Frame
Power Steering	Electric	-
Steering Column	Tilt and Telescopic	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Service Interval	10,000 km or 6 Months	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Approx R5,500	Premium
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	24 Months
Maintenance Plan	Optional	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Warranty Years	3	4
Warranty Kilometers	100000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	4 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
CO2 Emissions	177	220
Start Stop System	Not Available	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	None
Noise Level	70	-

Specification	GR86	Ranger
Approach Angle	-	32
Departure Angle	-	24
Wading Depth	-	850
Terrain Modes	-	Normal
Locking Differential	-	Electronic Rear Lock

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Ranger wins with 70 pts vs 60 pts for GR86

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, GR86 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

GR86 scores 6 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, GR86 scores 20 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

GR86 scores 12 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives GR86 8 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows GR86 scoring 14 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between GR86 and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: GR86 scores 14 vs 17.

Efficiency: GR86 scores 6 vs 6.

Safety: GR86 scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: GR86 scores 8 vs 11.

Ownership: GR86 scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.

Toyota GR86 vs Ford Ranger

Toyota GR86

Ford Ranger

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Ranger

GR86

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Ranger

GR86

Pros & Cons

GR86

Ranger

Who Should Buy Which?

GR86

Ranger

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis