Toyota GR Supra vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW (382 hp)
🔧 500 Nm
⛽ 11.2 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

1.8T Dark Edition DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 733,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW (188 hp)
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance GR Supra
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Territory

68
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

GR Supra

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both GR Supra and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance GR Supra +7 pts
Efficiency Territory +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Territory +3 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

GR Supra

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

GR Supra

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

GR Supra

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification GR Supra Territory
Ground Clearance 115 190
Wheelbase 2470 2716
Length 4379 4630
Width 1854 1935
Height 1294 1706
Kerb Weight 1570 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1970 2150
Seating Capacity 2 5
Boot Space 408 448
Towing Capacity Not Rated 1200
Front Track Width 1617 -
Rear Track Width 1607 -
Turning Radius 6.1 -
Specification GR Supra Territory
Engine 3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type B58 Inline-6 Turbo Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 2998 1798
Cylinders 6 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 285 140
Power @ RPM 5000 rpm -
Torque 500 320
Torque @ RPM 1800 rpm -
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Turbocharged -
Top Speed 250 185
0-100 km/h 4.3 9.8
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 -
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins with 68 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, GR Supra may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

GR Supra scores 7 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, GR Supra scores 18 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

GR Supra scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives GR Supra 10 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows GR Supra scoring 20 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between GR Supra and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: GR Supra scores 20 vs 13.

Efficiency: GR Supra scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: GR Supra scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: GR Supra scores 10 vs 13.

Ownership: GR Supra scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.