Toyota GR Supra vs Ford Ranger

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol Manual

Change Car A

ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom

⚡ 285 kW (382 hp)

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 11.2 km/l

Ford Ranger

2.0 Bi-Turbo Raptor 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic

Switch Variant

Change Car B

ZAR 1,040,000 ex-showroom

⚡ 157 kW (211 hp)

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 12.8 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance GR Supra

⛽ Mileage GR Supra

🔑 Ownership Ranger

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Ranger

/ 100

pts

GR Supra

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both GR Supra and Ranger are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance GR Supra +3 pts

Efficiency GR Supra +1 pts

Safety Ranger +2 pts

Practicality Ranger +1 pts

Ownership Ranger +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 11/20

Ownership 16/20

GR Supra

Performance 20/20

Efficiency 7/20

Safety 18/20

Practicality 10/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

GR Supra

Pros

More powerful engine output
Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger

Pros

Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

GR Supra

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Ranger

Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Ground Clearance	115	283
Wheelbase	2470	3270
Length	4379	5381
Width	1854	2180
Height	1294	1922
Kerb Weight	1570	2345
Gross Vehicle Weight	1970	3130
Seating Capacity	2	5
Boot Space	408	0
Towing Capacity	Not Rated	2500
Front Track Width	1617	-
Rear Track Width	1607	-
Turning Radius	6.1	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Engine	3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 Petrol	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	B58 Inline-6 Turbo	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement	2998	1996
Cylinders	6	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	285	157
Power @ RPM	5000 rpm	-
Torque	500	500
Torque @ RPM	1800 rpm	-
Fuel System	Direct Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Turbocharged	-
Top Speed	250	180
0-100 km/h	4.3	10.2
Compression Ratio	12.0:1	-
Engine Position	Front Longitudinal	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Transmission	6-speed Manual	10-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shift
Drive Type	RWD	4x4
Drivetrain Layout	Rear Wheel Drive	Full-Time 4WD
LSD Available	Electronic LSD	Electronic Locking Rear Differential
Paddle Shifters	Not Available	-
Transfer Case	Not Applicable	Electronic Two-Speed Transfer Case
Differential Lock	Not Applicable	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Claimed Mileage	11.2	12.8
City Mileage	9	8
Highway Mileage	14	11
Fuel Tank Capacity	52	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5
AdBlue Tank Capacity	Not Applicable	-
Auto Start Stop	Not Available	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Airbags	6	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard with Track Mode	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Standard
Hill Start Assist	Standard	-
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	-
Central Locking	Standard	-
Side Impact Beams	Standard	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	Not Available	-
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	Not Available	-
Traffic Sign Recognition	Not Available	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Seat Material	Leather	Raptor Leather and Suede
Seat Adjustment	Electric 6-Way	Power Driver and Passenger
Heated Seats	Front	Standard
Ventilated Seats	Front	Standard
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Multi-Colour Ambient Lighting
Folding Rear Seats	Not Available	-
Front Armrest	Standard	-
Rear Armrest	Not Available	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Climate Control	Automatic AC	Dual Zone Automatic
Power Windows	All Doors	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Standard	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Power Assisted Tailgate
Automatic Headlamps	Standard	-
Rain Sensing Wipers	Standard	-
Auto Dimming Mirror	Standard	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Infotainment Screen	12-inch SYNC 4 Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen with SYNC 4
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	8	10
Navigation System	Standard	Integrated GPS Navigation
Digital Instrument Cluster	12.4-inch Full Digital	-
USB Ports	2	-
Wireless Apple CarPlay	Standard	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
LED Headlamps	Full LED	Matrix LED with Adaptive Beam
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Heavy Duty Roof Rails
Alloy Wheel Design	19-inch Alloy Wheels	17-inch Raptor Off-road Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	Not Available	-
Body Cladding	Not Available	-
Rear Spoiler	Rear Spoiler	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Tyre Size	255/35 R19	285/70 R17 All-Terrain
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Brembo Ventilated Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Brembo Ventilated Disc	Disc
Spare Wheel Type	Space Saver	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Front Suspension	MacPherson Strut	FOX Racing Shocks with Aluminium Control Arms
Rear Suspension	Independent Multi-Link	FOX Racing Shocks with Watt Link
Chassis Type	Monocoque	Reinforced Ladder Frame
Power Steering	Electric	-
Steering Column	Tilt and Telescopic	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Service Interval	10,000 km or 1 Year	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Approx R7,000	Premium
Battery Warranty	Not Applicable	24 Months
Maintenance Plan	Optional	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Warranty Years	3	4
Warranty Kilometers	100000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	4 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	6 Years	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
CO2 Emissions	190	220
Start Stop System	Not Available	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	None
Noise Level	72	-

Specification	GR Supra	Ranger
Approach Angle	-	32
Departure Angle	-	24
Wading Depth	-	850
Terrain Modes	-	Normal
Locking Differential	-	Electronic Rear Lock

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Ranger wins with 70 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In structured scoring, Ranger emerges as the stronger overall package. However, GR Supra may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Ranger performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

GR Supra scores 7 while Ranger scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, GR Supra scores 18 and Ranger scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

GR Supra scores 12 versus Ranger scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives GR Supra 10 and Ranger 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows GR Supra scoring 20 compared to Ranger scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Ranger may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Ranger performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Ranger the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between GR Supra and Ranger in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: GR Supra scores 20 vs 17.

Efficiency: GR Supra scores 7 vs 6.

Safety: GR Supra scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: GR Supra scores 10 vs 11.

Ownership: GR Supra scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger the advantage in this comparison.

Toyota GR Supra vs Ford Ranger

Toyota GR Supra

Ford Ranger

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Ranger

GR Supra

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Ranger

GR Supra

Pros & Cons

GR Supra

Ranger

Who Should Buy Which?

GR Supra

Ranger

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis