Honda Fit vs Toyota Vitz

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 380,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 109 kW (146 hp)
🔧 253 Nm
⛽ 26 km/l
VS
Toyota Vitz in South Africa

Toyota Vitz

1.0 XR CVT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 229,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 51 kW (68 hp)
🔧 89 Nm
⛽ 18.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Fit
Mileage Fit
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Fit

69
/ 100
+14
pts
#2

Vitz

55
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Fit has a slight advantage, but Vitz remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Fit +6 pts
Efficiency Fit +10 pts
Safety Vitz +2 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 20/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Vitz

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 10/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Vitz

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Fit

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Vitz

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Fit Vitz
Ground Clearance 135 155
Wheelbase 2530 2490
Length 3995 3890
Width 1695 1695
Height 1515 1510
Kerb Weight 1150 960
Gross Vehicle Weight 1550 1360
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 304 265
Towing Capacity 800 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1470
Rear Track Width - 1455
Turning Radius - 4.9
Specification Fit Vitz
Engine 1.5L Hybrid Petrol 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Electric Motor 3-cylinder 1KR-FE
Displacement 1498 998
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 109 51
Torque 253 89
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 165
0-100 km/h 10.5 14.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 4300 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 10.0:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Fit wins with 69 pts vs 55 pts for Vitz

In structured scoring, Fit emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Vitz may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Fit performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Fit scores 20 while Vitz scores 10 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Fit scores 18 and Vitz scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Fit scores 12 versus Vitz scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Fit 9 and Vitz 9, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Fit scoring 10 compared to Vitz scoring 4, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Fit may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Fit performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Fit the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Fit and Vitz in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Fit scores 10 vs 4.

Efficiency: Fit scores 20 vs 10.

Safety: Fit scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Fit scores 9 vs 9.

Ownership: Fit scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Fit the advantage in this comparison.