Honda Fit vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 380,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 109 kW (146 hp)
🔧 253 Nm
⛽ 26 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Fit
Mileage Fit
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Fit

69
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Fit has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Fit +2 pts
Efficiency Fit +11 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +3 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 20/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Fit

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Fit Puma
Ground Clearance 135 170
Wheelbase 2530 2594
Length 3995 4186
Width 1695 1805
Height 1515 1531
Kerb Weight 1150 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1550 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 304 456
Towing Capacity 800 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Fit Puma
Engine 1.5L Hybrid Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Electric Motor Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1498 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 109 92
Torque 253 170
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Fit wins with 69 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Fit emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Fit performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Fit scores 20 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Fit scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Fit scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Fit 9 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Fit scoring 10 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Fit may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Fit performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Fit the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Fit and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Fit scores 10 vs 8.

Efficiency: Fit scores 20 vs 9.

Safety: Fit scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Fit scores 9 vs 12.

Ownership: Fit scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Fit the advantage in this comparison.