Ford Everest vs Ford Territory in South Africa – Comparison

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

71

🏆 Winner

3 Point Difference

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Territory

68

Executive Summary

Both Everest and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest (+4)

Efficiency Territory (+2)

Safety Everest (+2)

Practicality Territory (+1)

Ownership Equal

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

Territory

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy What?

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Territory

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Category Breakdown

Everest

Performance – 17/20

Efficiency – 6/20

Safety – 20/20

Practicality – 12/20

Ownership – 16/20

Territory

Performance – 13/20

Efficiency – 8/20

Safety – 18/20

Practicality – 13/20

Ownership – 16/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec	Everest	Territory
Ground Clearance	225	190
Wheelbase	2900	2716
Length	4914	4630
Width	1923	1935
Height	1842	1706
Kerb Weight	2400	1635
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	2150
Seating Capacity	7	5
Boot Space	259	448
Towing Capacity	3500	1200

Spec	Everest	Territory
Engine	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel	1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged	Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement	1996	1798
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	154	140
Torque	500	320
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Direct Injection
Top Speed	190	185
0-100 km/h	9.8	9.8

Spec	Everest	Territory
Transmission	10-Speed Automatic	7-Speed Dual Clutch Automatic
Drive Type	4x4	Front Wheel Drive
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	FWD
LSD Available	Electronic	Electronic
Transfer Case	Low Range Available	None

Spec	Everest	Territory
Claimed Mileage	13.2	13.5
City Mileage	8	10
Highway Mileage	12	14
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	60
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6

Spec	Everest	Territory
Airbags	7	6
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard

Spec	Everest	Territory
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Not Available
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Not Available
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Not Available
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Standard	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Standard

Spec	Everest	Territory
Seat Material	Leather	Cloth
Seat Adjustment	8-Way Power Driver	Manual
Heated Seats	Front	Not Available
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Standard	Single Colour

Spec	Everest	Territory
Climate Control	Dual Zone Automatic	Manual Air Conditioning
Power Windows	Standard	All Windows
Keyless Entry	Smart Key	Remote Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Standard	Not Available
Sunroof	Panoramic	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Hands-free	Manual

Spec	Everest	Territory
Infotainment Screen	12-inch Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Standard
Android Auto	Wireless	Standard
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	10	6
Navigation System	Built-in	Standard

Spec	Everest	Territory
LED Headlamps	Matrix LED	LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	Halogen
Roof Rails	Black	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	20-inch Alloy	18-inch Alloy

Spec	Everest	Territory
Approach Angle	30	18
Departure Angle	26	22
Wading Depth	800	450
Terrain Modes	Normal	Normal
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear	Electronic

Spec	Everest	Territory
Tyre Size	255/55 R20	235/55 R18
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Vented Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Disc

Spec	Everest	Territory
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Multi-link Coil Spring	Multi-link
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque

Spec	Everest	Territory
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Moderate
Battery Warranty	2 Years	24 Months

Spec	Everest	Territory
Warranty Years	4	4
Warranty Kilometers	120000	120000
Roadside Assistance	4 Years	4 Years

Spec	Everest	Territory
CO2 Emissions	198	175
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	None

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Territory may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 6 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 17 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 17 vs 13.

Efficiency: Everest scores 6 vs 8.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.