Ford Everest vs Volkswagen T-Roc

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic

Switch Variant

Change Car A

ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom

⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)

🔧 405 Nm

⛽ 14.0 km/l

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol Automatic

Change Car B

ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom

⚡ 110 kW (148 hp)

🔧 250 Nm

⛽ 14.0 km/l

＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Choose a car

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest

⛽ Mileage T-Roc

🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Everest

/ 100

pts

T-Roc

/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Everest and T-Roc are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +3 pts

Efficiency T-Roc +1 pts

Safety Equal

Practicality Everest +1 pts

Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20

Efficiency 7/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 16/20

T-Roc

Performance 10/20

Efficiency 8/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 11/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

T-Roc

Pros

Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

T-Roc

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Ground Clearance	220	168
Wheelbase	2900	2630
Length	4914	4234
Width	1923	1819
Height	1842	1573
Kerb Weight	2305	1400
Gross Vehicle Weight	3100	1880
Seating Capacity	7	5
Boot Space	259	392
Towing Capacity	3500	1200
Front Track Width	-	1569
Rear Track Width	-	1546
Turning Radius	-	5.4

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Engine	2.0L Single Turbo Diesel	1.4L TSI Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type	Inline 4 Turbocharged	Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement	1996	1395
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	125	110
Torque	405	250
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Direct Injection
Top Speed	180	203
0-100 km/h	11.5	9.1
Power @ RPM	-	5000-6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM	-	1500-3500 rpm
Turbocharger	-	Single Turbo
Compression Ratio	-	10.5:1
Engine Position	-	Front Transverse

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Transmission	6-Speed Automatic	7-Speed DSG Automatic
Drive Type	4x2	FWD
Drivetrain Layout	Rear Wheel Drive	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Electronic	Not Available
Transfer Case	Not Available	Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters	-	Standard
Differential Lock	-	Not Applicable

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Claimed Mileage	14.0	14.0
City Mileage	9	11
Highway Mileage	12	15
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	50
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6
AdBlue Tank Capacity	-	Not Applicable
Auto Start Stop	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Airbags	7	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Not Available	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Hill Start Assist	-	Standard
Alarm System	-	Standard
Central Locking	-	Standard
Side Impact Beams	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Cruise Control	Standard	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard
Lane Departure Warning	-	Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert	-	Standard
Traffic Sign Recognition	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Seat Material	Fabric	Partial Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	Electric 6-Way
Heated Seats	Not Available	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt & Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Standard
Folding Rear Seats	-	60/40 Split
Front Armrest	-	Standard
Rear Armrest	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Climate Control	Dual Zone	Automatic AC
Power Windows	Standard	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Standard	Smart Entry
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Standard
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Not Available
Automatic Headlamps	-	Standard
Rain Sensing Wipers	-	Standard
Auto Dimming Mirror	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Infotainment Screen	10-inch Touchscreen	10-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	8	8
Navigation System	Standard	Standard
Digital Instrument Cluster	-	10.25-inch Digital Cockpit
USB Ports	-	3
Wireless Apple CarPlay	-	Standard

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
LED Headlamps	Standard	Full LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	Standard	LED
Roof Rails	Standard	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	18-inch Alloy	18-inch Alloy
Chrome Exterior Finish	-	Not Available
Body Cladding	-	Standard
Rear Spoiler	-	Rear Spoiler

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Approach Angle	30	-
Departure Angle	25	-
Wading Depth	600	-
Terrain Modes	Normal	-
Locking Differential	Electronic	-

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Tyre Size	255/65 R18	215/50 R18
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Solid Disc
Spare Wheel Type	-	Space Saver

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Front Suspension	Independent Double Wishbone	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Multi-link Coil Spring	Multi-Link
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque
Power Steering	-	Electric
Steering Column	-	Tilt and Telescopic

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	15,000 km or 1 Year
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Approx R5,200
Battery Warranty	2 Years	Not Applicable
Maintenance Plan	-	Optional

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
Warranty Years	4	3
Warranty Kilometers	120000	100000
Roadside Assistance	4 Years	3 Years
Anti-Corrosion Warranty	-	6 Years

Specification	Everest	T-Roc
CO2 Emissions	190	128
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Noise Level	-	67

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 61 pts for T-Roc

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, T-Roc may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while T-Roc scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and T-Roc scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus T-Roc scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and T-Roc 11, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to T-Roc scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and T-Roc in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 10.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 11.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Everest vs Volkswagen T-Roc

Ford Everest

Volkswagen T-Roc

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

T-Roc

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Everest

T-Roc

Pros & Cons

Everest

T-Roc

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

T-Roc

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis