Ford Everest vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Everest
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+7
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Everest and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +5 pts
Efficiency Puma +2 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Equal
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest Puma
Ground Clearance 220 170
Wheelbase 2900 2594
Length 4914 4186
Width 1923 1805
Height 1842 1531
Kerb Weight 2305 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 1775
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 259 456
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Everest Puma
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1996 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 92
Torque 405 170
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 11.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 8.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.