Ford Everest vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW (131 hp)
🔧 304 Nm
⛽ 11.4 km/l
+
＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest
⛽ Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+19
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +3 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Everest +8 pts
Practicality Everest +4 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 220 215
Wheelbase 2900 2500
Length 4914 4875
Width 1923 1760
Height 1842 1655
Kerb Weight 2305 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 2400
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 259 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Front Track Width - 1495
Rear Track Width - 1490
Turning Radius - 5.8
Load Bed Length - 1907
Load Bed Width - 1454
Specification Everest NP300 Hardbody
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1996 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 98
Torque 405 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 168
0-100 km/h 11.5 12.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1750-2500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 17.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Everest vs Mustang →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Ranger
Ranger
Everest vs Ranger →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
Amaze
Amaze
Everest vs Amaze →
NP300 Hardbody
NP300 Hardbody
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
NP300 Hardbody vs EcoSport →
NP300 Hardbody
NP300 Hardbody
VS
Mustang
Mustang
NP300 Hardbody vs Mustang →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
CR-V
CR-V
Everest vs CR-V →
Everest
Everest
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Everest vs Elevate →
Everest
Everest
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Everest vs HR-V →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while NP300 Hardbody scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and NP300 Hardbody scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus NP300 Hardbody scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and NP300 Hardbody 8, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to NP300 Hardbody scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 10.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 8.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.