Ford Everest vs Nissan NP200

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 284,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 65 kW (87 hp)
🔧 147 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Everest
Mileage NP200
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+23
pts
#2

NP200

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest holds a noticeable edge over NP200, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +7 pts
Efficiency NP200 +1 pts
Safety Everest +8 pts
Practicality Everest +5 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

NP200

Performance 6/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP200

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

NP200

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest NP200
Ground Clearance 220 185
Wheelbase 2900 2400
Length 4914 4535
Width 1923 1615
Height 1842 1530
Kerb Weight 2305 915
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 1570
Seating Capacity 7 2
Boot Space 259 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 500
Front Track Width - 1390
Rear Track Width - 1385
Turning Radius - 5.5
Load Bed Length - 1815
Load Bed Width - 1530
Specification Everest NP200
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 1.6L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder
Displacement 1996 1598
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 65
Torque 405 147
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Injection
Top Speed 180 155
0-100 km/h 11.5 14.5
Power @ RPM - 5200 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2800 rpm
Turbocharger - Not Available
Compression Ratio - 9.5:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 45 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while NP200 scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and NP200 scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus NP200 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and NP200 7, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to NP200 scoring 6, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and NP200 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 6.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 7.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.