Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW (304 hp)
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 9.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Land Cruiser 300
Mileage Everest
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Land Cruiser 300

70
/ 100
+2
pts
#2

Everest

68
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Everest and Land Cruiser 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Land Cruiser 300 +7 pts
Efficiency Everest +2 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +1 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Pros & Cons

Everest

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Land Cruiser 300

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Land Cruiser 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest Land Cruiser 300
Ground Clearance 220 235
Wheelbase 2900 2850
Length 4914 4985
Width 1923 1980
Height 1842 1910
Kerb Weight 2305 2430
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 3300
Seating Capacity 7 7
Boot Space 259 309
Towing Capacity 3500 3500
Front Track Width - 1675
Rear Track Width - 1675
Turning Radius - 6.0
Specification Everest Land Cruiser 300
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 3.3L Twin-Turbo V6 Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged V6 Twin-Turbocharged DOHC
Displacement 1996 3346
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 227
Torque 405 700
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 210
0-100 km/h 11.5 7.5
Power @ RPM - 3000-3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1600-2600 rpm
Turbocharger - Twin Turbo
Compression Ratio - 15.4:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser 300 wins with 70 pts vs 68 pts for Everest

In structured scoring, Land Cruiser 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Everest may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Land Cruiser 300 performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while Land Cruiser 300 scores 5 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Land Cruiser 300 scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Land Cruiser 300 scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Land Cruiser 300 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to Land Cruiser 300 scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Land Cruiser 300 may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Land Cruiser 300 performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Land Cruiser 300 the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 20.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 5.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Land Cruiser 300 the advantage in this comparison.