Ford Everest vs Toyota Hiace

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Hiace in South Africa

Toyota Hiace

2.5D Panel Van MT Diesel Manual
ZAR 680,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW (101 hp)
🔧 200 Nm
⛽ 12.0 km/l
+
＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest
⛽ Mileage Hiace
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+29
pts
#2

Hiace

39
/ 100

High confidence result.

Executive Summary

Everest dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +6 pts
Efficiency Hiace +1 pts
Safety Everest +14 pts
Practicality Everest +6 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Hiace

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 6/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Hiace

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Hiace

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest Hiace
Ground Clearance 220 155
Wheelbase 2900 2985
Length 4914 4695
Width 1923 1880
Height 1842 1990
Kerb Weight 2305 1780
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 2800
Seating Capacity 7 3
Boot Space 259 0
Towing Capacity 3500 2800
Specification Everest Hiace
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbodiesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4-cylinder 2KD-FTV
Displacement 1996 2494
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 75
Torque 405 200
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 148
0-100 km/h 11.5 17.5
Power @ RPM - 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1800 rpm
Turbocharger - Turbocharged

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 39 pts for Hiace

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Hiace may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Everest vs Mustang →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Ranger
Ranger
Everest vs Ranger →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
Amaze
Amaze
Everest vs Amaze →
Hiace
Hiace
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Hiace vs EcoSport →
Hiace
Hiace
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Hiace vs Mustang →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
CR-V
CR-V
Everest vs CR-V →
Everest
Everest
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Everest vs Elevate →
Everest
Everest
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Everest vs HR-V →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while Hiace scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Hiace scores 6. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Hiace scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Hiace 6, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to Hiace scoring 7, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Hiace in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 7.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 6.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 6.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.