Ford Everest vs Toyota GR Supra

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol Manual
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW (382 hp)
🔧 500 Nm
⛽ 11.2 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance GR Supra
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+1
pts
#2

GR Supra

67
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both Everest and GR Supra are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance GR Supra +7 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Everest +2 pts
Practicality Everest +2 pts
Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

GR Supra

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best For: Family Usage

GR Supra

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

GR Supra

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest GR Supra
Ground Clearance 220 115
Wheelbase 2900 2470
Length 4914 4379
Width 1923 1854
Height 1842 1294
Kerb Weight 2305 1570
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 1970
Seating Capacity 7 2
Boot Space 259 408
Towing Capacity 3500 Not Rated
Front Track Width - 1617
Rear Track Width - 1607
Turning Radius - 6.1
Specification Everest GR Supra
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 3.0L Turbocharged Inline-6 Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged B58 Inline-6 Turbo
Displacement 1996 2998
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 285
Torque 405 500
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 250
0-100 km/h 11.5 4.3
Power @ RPM - 5000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 1800 rpm
Turbocharger - Turbocharged
Compression Ratio - 12.0:1
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, GR Supra may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while GR Supra scores 7 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and GR Supra scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus GR Supra scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and GR Supra 10, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to GR Supra scoring 20, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and GR Supra in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 20.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 10.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.