Ford Everest vs Toyota Fortuner in South Africa – Comparison

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

71

🏆 Winner

14 Point Difference

Moderate difference between the two models.

Fortuner

57

Executive Summary

Everest has a slight advantage, but Fortuner remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest (+4)

Efficiency Everest (+6)

Safety Equal

Practicality Equal

Ownership Everest (+4)

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
Better fuel efficiency
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

No major weaknesses

Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Fortuner

Pros

No major strengths

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Lower fuel efficiency
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy What?

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Fortuner

Buyers looking for a balanced all-round SUV

Category Breakdown

Everest

Performance – 17/20

Efficiency – 6/20

Safety – 20/20

Practicality – 12/20

Ownership – 16/20

Fortuner

Performance – 13/20

Efficiency – 0/20

Safety – 20/20

Practicality – 12/20

Ownership – 12/20

Full Specification Comparison

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Ground Clearance	225	225
Wheelbase	2900	2745
Length	4914	4795
Width	1923	1855
Height	1842	1835
Kerb Weight	2400	2010
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	2735
Seating Capacity	7	7
Boot Space	259	296
Towing Capacity	3500	2800

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Engine	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel	2.4L Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged	Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement	1996	2393
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	154	110
Torque	500	400
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed	190	180
0-100 km/h	9.8	11.8

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Transmission	10-Speed Automatic	6-Speed Automatic
Drive Type	4x4	4x2
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	Rear Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Electronic	Not Available
Transfer Case	Low Range Available	Not Applicable

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Claimed Mileage	13.2	13.2
City Mileage	8	9.5
Highway Mileage	12	13.5
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Airbags	7	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Not Available
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Not Available
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Not Available
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Standard	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Not Available

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Seat Material	Leather	Fabric
Seat Adjustment	8-Way Power Driver	Manual
Heated Seats	Front	Not Available
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Standard	Not Available

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Climate Control	Dual Zone Automatic	Manual
Power Windows	Standard	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Smart Key	Standard
Push Button Start	Standard	Not Available
Wireless Charging	Standard	Not Available
Sunroof	Panoramic	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Hands-free	Not Available

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Infotainment Screen	12-inch Touchscreen	8-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Standard
Android Auto	Wireless	Standard
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	10	6
Navigation System	Built-in	Optional

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
LED Headlamps	Matrix LED	Halogen Projector
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	Standard
Roof Rails	Black	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	20-inch Alloy	17-inch Alloy

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Approach Angle	30	29
Departure Angle	26	25
Wading Depth	800	700
Terrain Modes	Normal	Not Available
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear	Not Available

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Tyre Size	255/55 R20	265/65 R17
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Vented Disc	Ventilated Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Disc

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	Double Wishbone
Rear Suspension	Multi-link Coil Spring	Multi-link Coil Spring
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Ladder Frame

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	10000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Moderate
Battery Warranty	2 Years	24 Months

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
Warranty Years	4	3
Warranty Kilometers	120000	100000
Roadside Assistance	4 Years	3 Years

Spec	Everest	Fortuner
CO2 Emissions	198	215
Start Stop System	Standard	Not Available
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Final Verdict

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Fortuner may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 6 while Fortuner scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Fortuner scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Fortuner scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Fortuner 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 17 compared to Fortuner scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Fortuner in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 17 vs 13.

Efficiency: Everest scores 6 vs 0.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.