Ford EcoSport vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 395,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Tie
Mileage Tie
🔑 Ownership EcoSport

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

EcoSport

63
/ 100
+2
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both EcoSport and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Equal
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership EcoSport +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

EcoSport

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: General Use

Puma

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

EcoSport

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification EcoSport Puma
Ground Clearance 200 170
Wheelbase 2519 2594
Length 4325 4186
Width 1765 1805
Height 1653 1531
Kerb Weight 1290 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1740 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 352 456
Towing Capacity 950 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification EcoSport Puma
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Turbo Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 3 Turbocharged Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 998 999
Cylinders 3 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 92
Torque 170 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford EcoSport wins with 63 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, EcoSport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, EcoSport performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

EcoSport scores 9 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, EcoSport scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

EcoSport scores 16 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives EcoSport 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows EcoSport scoring 8 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest EcoSport may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. EcoSport performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives EcoSport the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between EcoSport and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: EcoSport scores 8 vs 8.

Efficiency: EcoSport scores 9 vs 9.

Safety: EcoSport scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: EcoSport scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: EcoSport scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives EcoSport the advantage in this comparison.